Online Surveillance in Turkey: Legislation, Technology and Citizen Involvement

Main Article Content

Bilge Yesil Efe Kerem Sozeri

Abstract

The AKP government has constructed an online surveillance regime (not to mention censorship) via various legal and technical means. This article analyzes the emergence and expansion of online surveillance within the context of the AKP’s authoritarian practices that are interwoven with its nationalist and populist politics.


It begins with an overview of legal and technical initiatives aimed at enhancing online surveillance, data collection and retention. It then focuses on the AKP’s recent strategies designed to bolster this online surveillance regime such as the institutionalization of online “snitching” via a newly-introduced social media app that enables citizen-informants to “report terrorists” to the authorities.  


The article argues that the AKP’s recent strategies and rationalities to regulate the conduct of online users are aligned with principles of “governing at a distance” and are informed by both its authoritarianism (exemplified by the repression of all forms of dissent in the broader media ecosystem) and its right-wing nationalism and populism (as seen in the stigmatizing of critical voices and/or certain groups as sources of threat, labelling them as “being against the nation” and as “terrorists”).

Article Details

How to Cite
YESIL, Bilge; SOZERI, Efe Kerem. Online Surveillance in Turkey: Legislation, Technology and Citizen Involvement. Surveillance & Society, [S.l.], v. 15, n. 3/4, p. 543-549, aug. 2017. ISSN 1477-7487. Available at: <https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/6637>. Date accessed: 20 oct. 2017.
Keywords
Surveillance; Internet; Authoritarianism
Section
Articles

References

Akser, M., Baybars-Hawks, B. Media and Democracy in Turkey: Toward a Model of Neoliberal Media Autocracy. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication 5 (3): 302-321.

Andrejevic, M. 2005. The Work of Watching One Another: Lateral Surveillance, Risk, and Governance. Surveillance & Society 2(4): 479-497 [Accessed: March 10, 2017].


Baglayan, B. 2017. The Turkish State of Emergency under Turkish Constitutional Law and International Human Rights Law. Insights: American Society of International Law, 21 (1) https://www.asil.org/insights/volume/21/issue/1/turkish-state-emergency-under-turkish-constitutional-law-and [Accessed March 3, 2017]
Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Sage.

Binark, M., Karatas, S., Comu, T., Koca, E. 2015. Turkiye’de Twitter’da Trol Kulturu. Toplum ve Bilim (135): 124-157.

Castel, R. 1991. From Dangerousness to Risk, In: The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, ed. G. Burchell, C. Gordon, P. Miller, 281-289). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Chan J. 2008. The New Lateral Surveillance and a Culture of Suspicion, In: “Surveillance and Governance: Crime Control and Beyond”, Sociology of Crime, Law and Deviance, Vol. 10, ed. M. Deflem, 223-239. Bingley, UK: Emerald.

Marquis-Boire, M., Marczak, B., Guarnieri, C., Scott-Railton, J. 2013. For Their Eyes Only: The Commercialization of Digital Spying. Citizen Lab https://citizenlab.org/2015/10 /mapping-finfishers-continuing-proliferation/ [Accessed February 20, 2017)

Cumhuriyet. 2017. Sosyal Medyaya Buyuk Operasyon. 14 January http://www.cumhuriyet .com.tr/haber/siyaset/660327/Sosyal_medyaya_buyuk_operasyon__17_bin_kisi_hakkinda_fezleke_hazirlandi__45_bin_kullanici_araniyor.html [Accessed February 18, 2017)

Ericson, R.V., and K.D. Haggerty. 1997. Policing the Risk Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission), Council of Europe. 2016. Turkey: Emergency Decree Laws. http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms /documents/?pdf=CDL-REF(2016)061-e [Accessed March 10, 2017]

Freedom House. 2016. Freedom on the Net 2016: Turkey. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default /files/FOTN%202016%20Turkey.pdf [Accessed March 3, 2017]
Icisleri Bakanligi. 2016. Basin Aciklamasi. 24 December. https://www.icisleri.gov.tr/basin-aciklamasi24122016 [Accessed February 20, 2017]

Kurban, D., Sozeri, C. 2012. Caught in the Wheels of Power: The Political, Legal and Economic Constraints on Independent Media and Freedom of the Press in Turkey. TESEV Publications, Istanbul: Turkey.

Larsen, M., and J. Piché. 2009. Public Vigilance Campaigns and Participatory Surveillance after 11 September 2001. In: Surveillance. Power, Problems, and Politics, eds S. Hier, and J. Greenberg, 187-202. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.

Lyon, D. 2001. Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Lyon, D. 2007. Surveillance Studies: An Overview. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

Ohm, B. 2015. Organizing Popular Discourse with and against the Media: Notes on the Making of Narendra Modi and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan as Leaders-without-Alternative. Television & New Media 16 (4): 370-377.

Ozeke, H.B. 2014. Turkey: Effects of the New National Intelligence Organization (MIT) Law on Privacy. Mondaq, 21 July. http://www.mondaq.com/turkey/x/328912/Data+Protection+Privacy/Effects+Of+The+New+National+Intelligence+Organization+Mit+Law+On+Privacy [Accessed February 20, 2017]

PEN International. 2015. Surveillance Secrecy and Self-Censorship: New Digital Freedom Challenges in Turkey. http://www.pen-international.org/newsitems/turkey-new-report-highlights-declining-space-for-freedom-of-
expression-in-the-digital-sphere/ [Accessed March 3, 2017]

Privacy International. 2014. The Right to Privacy in Turkey. https://www.privacyinternational.org /node/379 [Accessed February 20, 2017]

Reeves, J. 2012. If You See Something, Say Something: Lateral Surveillance and the Uses of Responsibility. Surveillance & Society 10 (3/4): 235-243 [Accessed: March 10, 2017].

Saka, E. 2014. The AK Party’s Social Media Strategy: Controlling the Uncontrollable. Turkish Review 4 (4): 418-423 [Accessed: February 18, 2017].

Saka, E. 2016. Siyasi Trolluk Ornegi Olarak Aktroller. Birikim (322): 17-21 [Accessed: February 18, 2017].

Tasdan, C. 2016. Provokatif Sosyal Medya Hesaplarina Karsi Ihbar Uyarisi. Anadolu Ajansi, 18 July. http://aa.com.tr/tr/15-temmuz-darbe-girisimi/provokatif-sosyal-medya-hesaplarina-karsi-ihbar-uyarisi/610539 [Accessed: March 3, 2017].

Simsek, B., Zengin, F. 2016. Sanal Teroristlere Sucustu. Sabah, 13 December. http://www.sabah.com.tr/gundem/2016/12/13/sanal-teroristlere-sucustu [Accessed: March 3, 2017].

Sozeri, E.K. 2016. Turkey Uses Emergency Decree to Shut Down Internet in 11 Kurdish Cities to Prevent Protests. The Daily Dot, 27 October. http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/turkey-cuts-kurdistan-internet/ [Accessed: March 10, 2017].

Telli Aydemir, A. 2016. State of Emergency Worsens Digital Crackdown in Turkey. EDRi European Digital Rights, 16 November. https://edri.org/state-of-emergency-worsens-digital-crackdown-in-turkey/ [Accessed March 3, 2017].

Yeni Safak, 2016. Sosyal Medyada Terore Destek Verenler Nasil Ihbar Edilir? 23 December. http://www.yenisafak.com/teknoloji/sosyal-medyada-terore-destek-verenler-nasil-ihbar-edilir-2585434 [Accessed: March 10, 2017].

Yesil, B. 2014. Press Censorship in Turkey: Networks of State Power, Commercial Pressures, and Self‐Censorship. Communication, Culture & Critique 7 (2): 154-173.

Yesil, B. 2016. Media in New Turkey: The Origins of an Authoritarian Neoliberal State. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.

Yesil, B., Sozeri, E.K., Khazraee, E. 2017. Turkey’s Internet Policy After the Coup Attempt: The Emergence of a Distributed Network of Online Suppression and Surveillance. Internet Policy Observatory, University of Pennsylvania. http://globalnetpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Turkey1_v6-1.pdf [Accessed: February 20, 2017].

Zeldin, W. 2015. Turkey: Recent Developments in National and Public Security Law. The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Center. https://www.loc.gov/law/help/national-security-law/turkey-recent-developments-2015.pdf [Accessed: March 10, 2017].