Main Article Content
When refugees displaced to Australia’s offshore detention do speak, it is through surveillance upended through publicity and violations of privacy. Weak legal rights to privacy in Australia juxtapose the increasing secrecy under which the Australian state operates its own offshore detention centres (Manus Island and Nauru) while increasing the mandate of data retention at home. Australia’s institutional context offers visibility to these concerns of surveillance whereby we find an acceleration of prohibitive privacy for government and prohibitive transparency for individuals. Our analysis of this country synthesises media-law in practice with theories of mediated visibility (Flyverbom 2016, 2017; Brighenti 2010), to understand Australian privacy, media and immigration law in the context of pervasive surveillance and the radical management of visibility. Our contribution speaks to applicable privacy concerns for states grappling with invasive data collection and its relation to the (prohibiting of the private) voice of the surveilled, which we see as doubly acute for those left vulnerable in Australia’s borderzones.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Surveillance & Society uses a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
- The author. The author licenses the article to the Surveillance Studies Network (SSN) for inclusion in Surveillance & Society (S&S), right of first publication. The copyright to the article remains with the author and any subsequent commercial reuse must be agreed by both parties.
- Non-commercial Users. SSN authorises all persons to use material published in S&S in any manner that is not primarily intended for or directed to commerical advantage or private monetary compensation, also provided that it is not modified and retains all attribution notices.
- Commercial Users. SSN retains the right to benefit from commerical reuse, in each specific case subject to the agreement of the author, and payment to SSN of a standard per-page fee (set by a vote of the Network and Editorial Board) by the Commercial User.
- Surveillance & Society supports open access archives and the free distribution of the results of academic work. Authors are encouraged to place copies of the final published version of their article in their university and / or other open access archives. We only ask that you make sure to include a link to the original published version on the Surveillance & Society website.
Barros, R. (2016), On the Outside Looking In: Secrecy and the Study of Authoritarian Regimes. Social Science Quarterly, 97: 953–973. doi:10.1111/ssqu.12350
Boochani, B. (2016, 16 April). Manus Island’s Appalling Health Care Record. The Saturday Paper. Retrieved from
Brevini, B. (2017). Metadata laws, journalism and resistance in Australia. Media and Communication, 5(1), 76-83.
Brighenti, A. (2007). Visibility a category for the social sciences. Current sociology, 55(3), 323-342. Chicago.
Briskman, L. (2013) Technology, Control and Surveillance in Australia’s Immigration Detention Centres. Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees. Vol 29, No 1, pp.
Briskman, L. (2016). Resisting Silence: Asylum Seekers and Voices of Conscience. Court of Conscience: Giving Rise to Minority. Issue 10.
Dastyari, A, and M O’Sullivan. 2016. “Not for Export: The Failure of Australia’s Extraterritorial Processing Regime in Papua New Guinea and the Decision of the PNG Supreme Court in Namah (2016).” Monash University Law Review 42 (2): 308–338.
Devetak, R. (2004). In fear of refugees: The politics of border protection in Australia. The International Journal of Human Rights, 8(1), 101-109.
Donoghue, P, Ford, M and Blumer, C. (2016, 9 June). Election 2016: 10 things Vote Compass reveals about voters' views on immigration. ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-06-09/election-2016-vote-compass-asylum-seekers-immmigration/7493064
Ettema, James S., and Theodore L. Glasser. (2005). “On the Epistemology of Investigative Journalism.” In Journalism: The Democratic Craft, edited by Stuart G.Adam and Roy P. Clark, 126–140. New York: Oxford University Press.
Evershed, N, Liu, R, Farrel, P, and Davidson, H. (2016) The lives of asylum seekers in detention detailed in a unique database. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/ng-interactive/2016/aug/10/the-nauru-files-the-lives-of-asylum-seekers-in-detention-detailed-in-a-unique-database-interactive
Farrell, P (2015, 11 May). Nauru says Facebook block a ‘temporary restriction’ to keep public safe from ‘sexual perverts’. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/weather/2015/may/11/facebook-block-in-nauru-a-temporary-restriction-says-government
Farrell, P., Evershed, N., & Davidson, H. (2016, 10 August). The Nauru files: Cache of 2,000 leaked reports reveal scale of abuse of children in Australian offshore detention. The Guardian Australia Edition. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/aug/10/the-nauru-files-2000-leaked-reports-reveal-scale-of-abuse-of-children-in-australian-offshore-detention
Farrell, P (2016, 15 April). Australia's attacks on journalists' sources are about politics, not national security. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/15/australias-attacks-on-journalists-sources-are-about-politics-not-national-security
Foster, M. (2012). The Implications of the Failed ‘Malaysian Solution’: The Australian High Court and Refugee Responsibility Sharing at International Law. Melbourne Journal of International Law, Vol 13, Issue 1, pp. 395-423
Flyverbom, M. (2016). Transparency: Mediation and the management of visibilities. International Journal of Communication, 10, 110-122.
Gerber, Paula and Wilkinson, Cai and Langlois, Anthony John and Offord, Baden, Human Rights in Papua New Guinea: Is this Where We Should Be Settling Refugees? (October 3, 2016). (2016) 22(1) Australian Journal of Human Rights 27.
Hasham, N (2015). Save the Children workers on Nauru have computers seized in second police raid. Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved from http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/save-the-children-workers-on-nauru-have-computers-seized-in-second-police-raid-20151022-gkfugi.html
Haylea, C & Hirsch, A (2017, in press). Social Workers as Collaborators? The Ethics of Working Within Australia’s Asylum System. Ethics and Social Welfare.
Henderson C (2014) Australia’s treatment of asylum seekers: From human rights violations to crimes against humanity. Journal of International Criminal Justice 12(5): 1161-1181.
Lyon, D. (1994). The electronic eye: The rise of surveillance society. U of Minnesota Press.
Mendez J (2015) Report of the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment UN Doc A/HRC/28/68
Olukotun, D. (2015, May 14). Why is a tiny island nation facing an internet shutdown? Access Blog. Retrieved from https://www.accessnow.org/blog/2015/05/14/why-is-a-tiny-island-nation-facing-an-internet-shutdown
Parasie, S. (2015). Data-driven revelation? Epistemological tensions in investigative journalism in the age of “big data”. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 364-380.
Saul B (2012) Dark justice: Australia's indefinite detention of refugees on security grounds under international human rights law. Melbourne Journal of International Law 13(2): 685-731.
Suzor, N, Pappalardo, K & McIntosh, N (2017). The passage of Australia’s data retention regime: national security, human rights, and media scrutiny. Internet Policy Review. Vol 6, Issue 1.
Tschakert, P., & Tuana, N. (2013). Situated resilience: Reframing vulnerability and security in the context of climate change. transformation, 3, 4.
Triggs, G. (2015). The Government, the High Court and the Migration Act. Australian Human Rights Commission. Retrieved from https://www.humanrights.gov.au/news/opinions/government-high-court-and-migration-act
Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2014). Is WikiLeaks challenging the paradigm of journalism? Boundary work and beyond. International Journal of Communication, 8(10), 2581-2592.
Wilson, D (2007). Australian Biometrics and Global Surveillance. International Criminal Justice Review. Vol 17, Issue 3, pp. 207-219.
Wilson, D & Weber, L (2008). Surveillance, Risk and Preemption on the Australian Border. Surveillance & Society. Vol 5, Issue 2, pp. 124-141.