Authoritarianism and privacy: The moderating role of terrorism

Main Article Content

Gareth Norris

Abstract

The resurgence in interest in authoritarianism has been linked to a rise in the acceptance of right-wing ideology and also restrictions on civil liberties, particularly in relation to surveillance and the right to privacy. Whilst we can observe simple correlations between these variables, the dynamics of threat are more complex to understand. The analysis reported here demonstrates how the relationship between authoritarianism and the curtailment of civil liberties is moderated by the threat of terrorism. Using 2005 British Social Attitudes survey data, collected either side of the 7/7 bombings, comparisons between the pre-post samples indicate that the threat of terrorism activates authoritarian tendencies and reduces the protection of rights to privacy from government. Interestingly and importantly, reactions to terrorism in the form of a change in opinion regarding civil liberties for those scoring higher in authoritarianism remained almost constant between the two periods. The results provide support for understanding how minority opinions (removal of rights to privacy) can become majority views during times of threat.

Article Details

How to Cite
NORRIS, Gareth. Authoritarianism and privacy: The moderating role of terrorism. Surveillance & Society, [S.l.], v. 15, n. 3/4, p. 573-581, aug. 2017. ISSN 1477-7487. Available at: <https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/6607>. Date accessed: 17 oct. 2017.
Keywords
Authoritarianism; Privacy; Terrorism; Threat; Civil Liberties
Section
Articles

References

Adorno., T.W., Frenkel-Brunswick, E., Levinson, D.J., & Sanford, R. N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper.

Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.

Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies of Freedom. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.

Angrist, J. (1991). The draft lottery and voluntary enlistment in the Vietnam era. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86, 584-95.

Christie, R. & Jahoda, M. (1954). Studies in the scope and method of the Authoritarian Personality. Glencoe, Il: Free Press.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Social Sciences. New York: Academic Press.

Cohrs, C., Kielmann, S., Maes, J., & Moschner, B. (2005). Effects of right-wing authoritarianism and threat from terrorism on restriction of civil liberties. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 5, 263-276.

Doty, R.M., Peterson, B.E., & Winter, D.G. (1991). Threat and authoritarianism in the United States, 1978-1987. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 629-640.

Feldman, S., & Stenner, K. (1997). Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 18, 741-770.

Hastings, B. M., & Shaffer, B. (2005). Authoritarianism and sociopolitical attitudes in response to threats of terror. Psychological Reports, 97, 623-630.

Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

Heaven, P.C.L., Organ, L., Supavadeeprasit, S., & Leeson, P. (2006). War and prejudice: A study in social values, right-wing authoritarianism, and social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 599-608.

Hetherington, M.J. and Suhay, E. (2011). Authoritarianism, threat, and American’s support for the war on terror. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 546-560.

Hyman, H.H., and Sheatsley, P.B. (1954). “The Authoritarian Personality”: A methodological critique. In R. Christie, and M. Jahoda (Eds.). Studies in the Scope and Method of The Authoritarian Personality (pp. 50-122). Glencoe, Il: Free Press.

Johnson, M. & Gearty, C. (2007). Civil liberties and the challenge of terrorism. In A. Park, J. Curtice, K. Thompson, M. Phillips, & M. Johnson, (Eds). British Social Attitudes (The 23rd Report): Perspectives on a Changing Society (pp.143-182). London: Sage Publications/NatCen.

Jost, J., Napier, J., Thorisdottir, H., Gosling, S., Palfai, T., & Ostafin, B. (2007). Are needs to manage uncertainty and threat associated with political conservatism or ideological extremity? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 989-1007.

Jugert, P. and Duckitt, J. (2009). A motivational model of authoritarianism: Integrating personal and situational determinants. Political Psychology, 30, 693-719.

Kam, C.D. and Kinder, D.R. (2007). Terror and ethnocentrism: Foundations of American support for the war on terrorism. The Journal of Politics, 69(2), 320-338.

Lavine, H., Lodge, M., & Freitas, K. (2005). Authoritarianism, threat, and selective exposure to information. Political Psychology, 26, 219-244.

Martin, J.L. (2001). The Authoritarian Personality, 50 years later: What lessons are there for political psychology? Political Psychology, 22, 1-26.

Merolla, J., Ramos, J., & Zechmeister, E. (2006). Authoritarian attitudes under crisis: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Society for Political Psychology, Barcelona, July 12-15.

Nail, P.R., McGregor, I., Drinkwater, A.E., Steele, G.M., and Thompson, T.W. (2009). Threat causes liberals to think like conservatives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 901-907.

Park, A., Curtice, J., Thompson, K., Phillips, M., & Johnson, M. (2007). British Social Attitudes (The 23rd Report): Perspectives on a Changing Society. London: Sage Publications/NatCen.

Perrin, A. ( 2005). National Threat and Political Culture: Authoritarianism, Anti-Authoritarianism, and the September 11 Attacks. Political Psychology, 26, 167-194.

Sales, S.M. (1972). Economic threat as a determinant of conversion rates in authoritarian and non-authoritarian churches. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 23, 420-428.

Sales, S.M. (1973). Threat as a factor in authoritarianism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 44-57.

Van de Vyver, J., Houston, D.M., Abrams, D., and Vasiljevic, M. (2016). Boosting beligerance: How the July 7, 2005, London bombings affected liberal’s moral foundations and prejudice. Psychological Science, 27(2), 169-177.