Main Article Content
Surveillance-infused forms of algorithmic discrimination are beginning to capture public and scholarly attention. While this is an encouraging development, this editorial questions the parameters of this emerging discussion and cautions against algorithmic fetishism. I characterize algorithmic fetishism as the pleasurable pursuit of opening the black box, discovering the code hidden inside, exploring its beauty and flaws, and explicating its intricacies. It is a technophilic desire for arcane knowledge that can never be grasped completely, so it continually lures one forward into technical realms while deferring the point of intervention. The editorial concludes with a review of the articles in this open issue.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Surveillance & Society uses a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.
- The author. The author licenses the article to the Surveillance Studies Network (SSN) for inclusion in Surveillance & Society (S&S), right of first publication. The copyright to the article remains with the author and any subsequent commercial reuse must be agreed by both parties.
- Non-commercial Users. SSN authorises all persons to use material published in S&S in any manner that is not primarily intended for or directed to commerical advantage or private monetary compensation, also provided that it is not modified and retains all attribution notices.
- Commercial Users. SSN retains the right to benefit from commerical reuse, in each specific case subject to the agreement of the author, and payment to SSN of a standard per-page fee (set by a vote of the Network and Editorial Board) by the Commercial User.
- Surveillance & Society supports open access archives and the free distribution of the results of academic work. Authors are encouraged to place copies of the final published version of their article in their university and / or other open access archives. We only ask that you make sure to include a link to the original published version on the Surveillance & Society website.
Ananny, Mike, and Kate Crawford. 2016. Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society 20 (3):973-989
Angwin, Julia, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine Bias. ProPublica, May 23. Available from https://http://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing [accessed March 29, 2018].
Ball, Kirstie, Ana Canhoto, Elizabeth Daniel, Sally Dibb, Maureen Meadows, and Keith Spiller. 2015. The Private Security State?: Surveillance, Consumer data and the War on Terror. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Barocas, Solon, and Andrew D. Selbst. 2016. Big Data’s Disparate Impact. California Law Review 104 (3):671-732
Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Browne, Simone. 2015. Dark matters: On the surveillance of blackness. Durham: Duke University Press.
Brucato, Ben. 2015. The New Transparency: Police Violence in the Context of Ubiquitous Surveillance. Media and Communication 3 (3):39-55
Crawford, Kate. 2016. Can an algorithm be agonistic? Ten scenes from life in calculated publics. Science, Technology & Human Values 41 (1):77-92
EPIC. 2015. Algorithmic Transparency: End Secret Profiling. Electronic Privacy Information Center, February 25. Available from https://http://www.epic.org/algorithmic-transparency/ [accessed March 29, 2018].
Eubanks, Virginia. 2017. Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Gandy Jr., Oscar H. 2009. Coming to Terms with Chance: Engaging Rational Discrimination and Cumulative Disadvantage. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Gazi, Jeeshan. 2018. Soiveillance: Self-Consciousness and the Social Network in Hideaki Anno’s Love & Pop. Surveillance & Society 16 (1):84-111.
Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Haraway, Donna J. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
Hendrix, Josh A., Travis A. Taniguchi, Kevin J. Strom, Kelle Barrick, and Nicole J. Johnson. 2018. The Eyes of Law Enforcement in the New Panopticon: Police-Community Racial Asymmetry and the Use of Surveillance Technology. Surveillance & Society 16 (1):53-68.
Hetherington, Kregg. 2011. Guerrilla auditors: the politics of transparency in neoliberal Paraguay. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Kirchner, Lauren. 2017. New York City moves to create accountability for algorithms. Ars Technica, December 19. Available from https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/12/new-york-city-moves-to-create-accountability-for-algorithms/ [accessed March 29, 2018].
Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Lyon, David, ed. 2003. Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination. New York: Routledge.
Monahan, Torin. 2010. Surveillance in the Time of Insecurity. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Musik, Christoph. 2018. It’s the Camera! A Special One: The Smartboxing of Image Processing Algorithms and their Uncertainties in Media Representations of Surveillance Technology. Surveillance & Society 16 (1):6-19.
New York City Council. 2018. Automated decision systems used by agencies. Legislative Research Center, January 11. Available from http://legistar.council.nyc.gov/LegislationDetail.aspx?ID=3137815&GUID=437A6A6D-62E1-47E2-9C42-461253F9C6D0 [accessed March 29, 2018].
Noble, Safiya Umoja. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: New York University Press.
Pasquale, Frank. 2017. From Territorial to Functional Sovereignty: The Case of Amazon. Law and Political Economy, December 6. Available from https://lpeblog.org/2017/12/06/from-territorial-to-functional-sovereignty-the-case-of-amazon/ [accessed January 5, 2018].
Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Regan, Priscilla M., Torin Monahan, and Krista Craven. 2015. Constructing the Suspicious: Data Production, Circulation, and Interpretation by DHS Fusion Centers. Administration & Society 47 (6):740-762
Richardson, Rashida. 2017. New York City Takes on Algorithmic Discrimination. American Civil Liberties Union, December 12. Available from https://http://www.aclu.org/blog/privacy-technology/surveillance-technologies/new-york-city-takes-algorithmic-discrimination [accessed March 29, 2018].
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Srnicek, Nick. 2017. Platform Capitalism. Malden, MA: Polity.
Testa, Alberto. 2018. The All-Seeing Eye of State Surveillance in the Italian Football (Soccer) Terraces: The Case Study of the Football Fan Card. Surveillance & Society 16 (1):69-83.
Winner, Langdon. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wood, Mark A., and Chrissy Thompson. 2018. Crowdsourced Countersurveillance: A Countersurveillant Assemblage? Surveillance & Society 16 (1):20-38.
Zajko, Mike. 2018. Security against Surveillance: IT Security as Resistance to Pervasive Surveillance. Surveillance & Society 16 (1):39-52.