Main Article Content
The particular vulnerability to sexual assault that is experienced by women who are Aboriginal, disabled, or Black was discussed by the Coalition in its factum in O’Conner (paragraphs 17 to 24). Other cases will expose the particular operation and intersection of more inequalities that continue not to be acknowledged or challenged by a legal system that fails to invoke the guarantees of section 15. It is material to acknowledge that neither the O’Conner case nor the present appeal represent all the dynamics of power and institutionalized oppression to which women are subject.
How to Cite
AYLWARD, Carol. Intersectionality: Crossing the Theoretical and Praxis Divide. Journal of Critical Race Inquiry, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, may 2011. ISSN 1925-3850. Available at: <https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/CRI/article/view/3549>. Date accessed: 29 june 2017.
intersectionality; women; gender; aboriginal; first nations; indigenous; critical race feminism; discrimination; public policy; law; the supreme court of canada; canada
Authors who publish with the Journal of Critical Race Inquiry (CRI) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).